I'm no expert on law, but I'm not sure if 40 is the "lawful" maximum. Someone on the other thread wrote that 10 was the lawful minimum, but 40 is just the impression I personally have as the typical number of paid days off due to contract rather than law.
Actually, I was also surprised to learn from the other thread that there are no laws on sick leave (although the poster who insisted that is very reliable, and I trust that comment). Because in reality, a lot of employees do end up getting a certain percentage of their salary even if they are sick for a long time. Also, lawfully, workers are entitled to compensation for industrial accidents (rosai-hosho). Therefore, if the company admits that certain injuries or sickness of an employee was caused by their labor, they will pay for the medical fees. I once slipped on the snow in front of my home on my way to work and broke a bone (Yes, you may laugh.). My boss heard the rumor, came up to me and insisted that the company pay for all my medical fees, in which they did, and I wasn't even a permanent employee.
However, this brings us back to what we discussed before. Not all companies compensate just like that. For example, if you were injured while handling a machine in the company's factory, that's obvious. But I know a foreign illegal worker who was injured while riding his bike during his meal break, and it took a while until the company decided to compensate for that.
Back to the topic, the government have been encouraging people to work less. Indeed, those who wish to go home on time tend to choose to become civil servants instead of company employees. Civil servants working situations are closer to what the government encourages.
And pressured by the government, company administration sections have been pressuring workers to work less. I remember that back in the late 80s, our company typically decided that Wednesday shall be "no-overwork-day (no zangyo dei)" and on Wednesday evenings, the guy from administration would started shouting around the office telling workers to pass their job to their bosses and go home. However, this didn't work, as bosses couldn't do the job as accurately as the employees who were doing it every day.
So maybe this is what you want to read about, Macmac. Japan does have a unique way of doing things when it comes to work ethics: People love to work. A lot of them are workaholics. Ever since the end of WW2, when people started thinking they need to work hard to regain what they lost during the war and to be as wealthy as the people in the GHQ, people have been workaholics. And it had been very rewarding: Honda, Mitsui, Sony, you name it. Therefore, business in Japan has been running in that sort of speed for a long time. So it's difficult to stop it now.
Let's say there's a company with 100 workers, and all of them work an average of 12 hours a day, and hardly takes days off (There are lots of these kind). Let's say, this company suddenly starts obeying the government encouragement and starts sending all their workers home at 5pm and makes all of them take 40 days off a year. That company will run out of business, because they can't maintain what they have been maintaining due to the long working hours.
But yes, this is gradually changing. A lot of company administrations are forcing workers to take more days off. For example, I remember that already in the 80s, our company contract was something like; you have the right to take 10 days off on your first year, that 10 plus another 10 (total of 20) on the next, another 10 on the next and finally you end up having the right to take maybe 40 days off on your forth year or something. But since 40 was the maximum due to the contract (not by law), workers tried to use them up little by little before the total goes over 41. In the recent decade or so, a lot of companies are forcing "refresh holidays (rifuresshu kyuka)" in which, typically, on your 10th year of working in the company, you are forced to take 2 weeks off or something.
Really though, work ethics differ greatly depending on the company, generation or region. In my New Years family-get-together, one of my cousins took a day off on January 5th, since this day was practically for the company's New Years greeting and there wasn't much desk work to do. Plus her company had been encouraging employees to take days off. But another cousin and an uncle grumbled (over too much beer, may I add) that she shouldn't have. They insisted that New Years company greetings are important upon building the workers work ethics and that workers should be more loyal by attending them. I was on the other cousin's side and said, "But that's the very reason that Japan is suffering lower birthrates! You can't work and raise families at the same time. You gotta take days off when you can." and the beer guys said, "You've got a point there."
So generally speaking, I think that the government and law in Japan are as concerned about the workers as they are in Europe. But due to circumstances, not all employers obey the government or law. And if the government/law should pressure them, the economy may collapse, because each country has its unique balance. But laws do work when there is a law suit or when there is a union protest. So the government and law always needs improving, and workers always need to reconsider their work ethics as time changes. Anyway, 1 plus 1 isn't really 2 in the real world. The real world is more fuzzy.
A bit off-topic, I'm not really surprised to learn that you've lived in Japan, Macmac. Your opinions sound like something that's coming from a typical young student internet-user. Lots of Japanese internet geeks have a really wrong impression about Europe and other foreign countries. Hey, they even have wrong ideas about working situations in their own country.
By the way, I can't recall the crisis on Belgium. I know I'm the ignorant one, but see? That's how people are.
|