No, there is not any legal action you can take against this company in this instance.
The rest of this is opinion, so you can stop reading now if you fear it will upset you, but that is not my intent.
None of this is meant to get your goat or start a ''flame war'' as I have no interest in provoking you.
The name of the forum is ''living'' though, as in ''living in Japan'' and it is a public forum, so people might extend unwanted advice or opinions because they may see aspects of a situation that you have overlooked or were not aware of. You, in turn, are free to ignore them.
1) Your gut response to some sort of conflict or disagreement in Japan should never be ''legal action.'' It really is true that it is best to try to discuss things and adopt an attitude of in terms of demeanor and words that indicates that you are trying to understand the situation from the other party's point of view.
2) It is *possible* that the agency has some sort of Yakuza ties, maybe a couple of steps removed. During the bubble years the Yakuza were heavily involved in real estate, and I am sure that some involvement remains. (I have met a number of older Japanese who generally view people in the real estate industry as being people to be very wary of.) If you have any feeling that this might be the case, you might want to cut your losses and find a different place to live. Be prepared to have to give notice/pay a few months of rent, depending on the terms of your contract.
2) That being said, it is most likely that in this case it is just that the agency is run by a businessman who is more numbers oriented than people oriented. And remember, the main customer for the agency is the landlord, not you. When you are a prospective tenant, you will be treated the best you ever will be by the agency. Once you are under contract and have paid your key money, etc., you are an income stream. Staff at a good agency will still be polite to you, but if you feel they are worried you might take your business elsewhere, they are not too worried about that.
3) I am not sure what happened in the office, but if the company was closed, it was closed. Just because the door wasn't immediately locked at 5:00 on the dot or whatever does not mean that they were prepared to conduct business. When a company closes for the day, things are put away, the money is locked in the safe, many of the staff may have already left, etc. As you mentioned, only the company president was left, and he may very well not be used to dealing with tenants directly anymore. Since the office was closed any cash on hand would already be locked away, so I can understand the company president expecting your husband to go find change himself. The office is not a retail outlet in any case, and may not be able to make change easily even during business hours; if you are going to pay the rent in cash, bring the exact amount.
What I really would recommend is setting up a monthly transfer from your bankaccount. That will make the agency the happiest and will minimize the amount of face to face dealing you will have with them. I would bet most of their tenants pay that way. If the extra fee is a burden or you don't have a bank account (and we have alll had times in our life when money is tight, so this is not a dig at you), that might explain why the owner said something along the lines of ''I doubt you have the money to move.'' That comment itself is so far out there, it kind of tells me there ispossibly something about your husband's appearance or conduct that might not engender a lot of respect from the company president or landlord.
4) At whatever point your husband realized that he had come into the office after business hours, he should have apologized profusely for his cluelessness and offered to come back another time during business hours. Your husband was causing meiwaku. (I wonder if he is kind of young, because he should know this stuff, and his getting that upset about ''san'' versus ''sama'' seems like he might still be a little insecure about his status as a shakaijin). Instead, he took a ''customer is always right'' attitude, which was the wrong thing in this situation. By apologizing and offerring to come back later, he allows the other side to adjust their response to whatever is best for them (it might be that they would rather have the money now for sure instead of waiting for your husband to come back another day, so the other person might be gracious and say, ''No, it is OK this time, but please try to come before 5:00 in the future,'' or if it is really inconvenient to accept the money after hours they can say, ''Yes, please come back tomorrow.'')
5) I can't imagine what your husband expected by calling later that same day, after already being told that the office was closed and after having dealt with the president of the firm himself. Bothering people on their off hours just because you are upset is not going to get you any kind of apology, and this kind of reinforces my suspicions that your husband is kind of young and inexperienced. And then calling the landlord to tattle about being treated rudely? All the landlord cares about is getting the rents from the agency. He pays the agency to deal with tenants and has no interest in getting involved in some minor tenant dispute. He probably has a long relationship with the agency and is happy with their service. Why would he take the company president to task because one of the tenants feels they weren't treated with enough deference? Sorry to be blunt, but your husband was being the very definition of a nuisance in this case.
This was not meant to upset you, as I have no reason for wanting to do so. I hope you find a few nuggets of insight among all the blather that might help you.
By the way, I am a teenager typing this in my parents basement.
|