"I have seen your negative sentiment towards Japan and its system and it's quite misleading sometimes. Just some fact corrections." -- Tai
Being ultranationalistic and trying to bully foreigners in order to hide the truth, silence them, or force them to say what you want is not a worthy or honest goal.
I have no negative sentiment towards Japan, the perception of any "negative sentiment" is your personal opinion and can be about excessive sensitivity or fragility. Rethink what you are trying to do and how it looks.
You can't "correct" the life experiences and opinions of foreigners who have lived in Japan or even other Japanese, so that it will be what you want to read or hear.
"Japanese nationals keep paying pension in since they turn 20... If the said foreign person hadn't started paying at this age, it can't be "full pension money"."--Tai
Clearly you don't know what you are talking about. Please at least do your research or actually have and talk to some foreign friends. Foreigners don't need to have been paying into the pension system since 20 years old.
In order for foreigners to receive pension benefits they must pay into the system for 10 years, or they can received a lump payment if they had paid into the system for at least 6 months.
However, there is a huge gap, which many foreigners fall into. If for instance they had worked in Japan for say between 5 to 8 years and leave Japan, they will only receive a one time lump payment up to 3 years. That means the remaining pension money is kept by Japan and they will never see it. If they take the lump payment, then return to Japan, the amount of time they must pay to receive pension benefits is reset to 0. Thus they must stay and work in Japan for 10 more years (and will only receive pension benefits on that).
Many foreigners in Japan who are married, can have gaps in the years worked. They can have been married for 8 years, but worked 5 years. If they get a divorce and leave Japan, they too will fall into the scenario above. Not receive the full amount of pension for the years worked. Out of the 8 years worked, will only get 3 years worth from a lump payment. This is a matter of fact, that can be verified.
"Immigration wouldn't take the situation of the divorce into consideration. Even if the foreign person insists the reason existed on his spouse's side, who knows."--Tai
You missed the part that the person I was referring to is the foreign father of Japanese national children. In fact, I know of other similar situations. It is not simply a matter that he got divorced or the reasons for it, but that kicking him out of the country means he couldn't see his children. That is clearly devastating.
""The reason for the divorce is not counted" should be a proper explanation."--Tai
This additional explanation that you want to force, perhaps to promote the impression that Japan is a perfect place, is nonsensical.
One of the requirements to get the long-term resident visa, is that the foreign person must prove they are able to support themselves financially. In that case, the foreign person didn't have a stable job that made enough money to qualify for a long-term resident or work visa.
This is another problem specific to married foreigners in Japan. They are able to do any type of work. This could be a club bouncer, part-time English tutor, cashier, temp construction, etc... These various types of jobs can be fine for a married couple that has 2 sources of income, but aren't making enough money to be considered financially stable (or possibly considered unacceptable types of employment by immigration). Their application can thus be rejected.
It is in the best interest of foreigners to know of such things ahead of time, so as to avoid havoc in the event of a divorce, which might come suddenly. One of the hardest things to do, is to scramble to find a high enough paying job on short notice. Also, the hiring process in Japan can take a long time and consist of 3 to 5 interviews in various cases.
"Objectivity will make your post a bit easy to read. Just my two cents."--Tai
I agree with you that objectivity is important. This is not something that only I should consider, but yourself as well. There are different sides of a story. Presenting only a Japanese side that portrays a false image of "perfect place" or "happy land" (while actively attempting to silence any who might not go along with this), is not objectivity.
"Yes, dear foreigners. Japan is "happy land", where rainbows shine brightly every day. It is a perfect society, that is better than all others on Earth. You will be greatly impressed and marvel at all things Japanese. Particularly their superior intelligence, ingenuity, and culture. Remember, all things here are fantastic and perfect, and be sure to say nothing else but this." Is that more to your liking and sensibilities?
As mentioned previously, Japan can actually be a great place to live and temporarily visit for foreign people. However, the point of the forum is to provide real, honest, and helpful information, not propaganda.
|