Tristan: I doubt that you will have people just coming up to you and playing wtih your hair, if that's what you mean. It is always possible that if you make a very close friend in Japan, they might do that. But for the general populace, Japan is more of a polite society than most, in terms of touchiness, to the extent that I went to a bar the other night with some friends and met a few Japanese boys (I am doing an abroad program in college and am living in Kyoto). One of them asked if I would be back in the bar next week, and I said sure, and then he and his friends walked me out to a cab (my friends left in a cab about two minutes prior), and as soon as he rather suddenly gave me a 1 second, very casual by my standards hug (no torso contact, just an arm around the shoulder and a quick squeeze), instead of thinking that he was drunk and/or just friendly, I suddenly thought, oh man I just agreed to a date, didn't I? (Obviously I don't know as much about Japanese culture yet as I'm making myself sound, if I didn't catch that until the hug). His friend, who I had talked to a lot more that night but wasn't the one who asked if I would be back next week, didn't come near me while I was leaving. I could be wrong (I guess I'll find out on Friday night), but from my own experience and feeling, casual touching isn't really done here (hence why I thought that this boy thought we had cemented some kind of relationship there. Either that or he was emulating my male friends who had just left). What Japanese people WILL do is stare at you, maybe whisper about you, maybe a child will yell to his parent GAIJIN (foreigner), sometimes if you pass a class of schoolgirls, they might all start yelling HELLO! at you, and some really friendly people will want to chat with you just cuz you look foreign and maybe practice their english. No touching, though, unless you've established something like that.
Sorry for the long convoluted explanation.
Now, about the eyes thing. I can't claim to know everything about it, but I am a biology major. Eye, skin, and hair color are controlled by multiple genes each. Each of these genes have multiple alleles that have varying levels of dominance and recessivity. These genes work together in what are called ''epistatic interactions.''
If you work it out, even a simple epistatic interaction, 2 genes, only 2 alleles each (a dominant and a recessive) you get nine different physical outcomes. Now I'm sure that the genes for eye color work more subtely and more complicatedly than that. That bullshit they feed you in middle school bio class about a mendelian chart showing brown eyes being dominant and blue eyes being recessive is just that: bullshit. It's like telling a half truth. It's only true to an extent (this extent being that blue in general seems to be more recessive than brown). The only reason why that example is used is because all little kids know that lots of people have brown eyes and fewer people have blue eyes. Hell, my teacher even threw in green eyes as being even more recessive just for good measure.
But that's not how it works, and that's why we DO have such a variance in eye color. Eye color is never used as an example for simple dominance or recessivity in more advanced biology classes. Even albinoism (lack of color pigment) has it's degrees in eye color. I mean, think of it. Genes are PRECISE, incredibly so. The person who first posted this question simply asked asked with the consideration of brown as dominant and blue as recessive. If there was one gene involved, and only this brown allele and this blue allele, then three-fourths of the world would have the exact same shade of brown eye color and one-forth would have the exact same shade of blue. The only variance would be caused by mutation of the gene, which wouldn't be unlikely because having a different eye color usually won't kill a creature. But since the rest of us would be the same, we would probably notice immediately, point and yell FREAK, shun the poor kid, and they wouldn't be able to reproduce to send the new allele onwards (natural selection at it's finest).
I do in fact vaguely remember some kid asking in class about how eye color epistatic interactions work probably thinking that it was a simple enough question, and the professor said that he would not be able to go into that. I'm not totally current on literature, but I'm pretty sure that scientists, even specialists researching this exact, specific topic about eye color genes and their interactions, still don't quite know what's going on.
All of us have the same exact color pigment in our eyes. It's not like in plants, where GREEN pigment is CHLOROPHYLL and ORANGE is CAROTENE (orange like carrots). Eye color is based on placement and amount of this pigment, I think. So your parents are always passing down the same pigment as theirs, there are just other factors involved, if this makes it easier to understand. There are many different options for why a child would have an unexpected eye color, the most obvious being ancestry that wasn't considered before. Considering all the genes that could be involved in eye color though, it could just be a very rare combination of genes that isn't really seen much. Who knows? I certainly don't. When I hear about things like this, I just file them away as interesting little factoids, because I know I can't explain it.
Sorry if I sounded pretentions or wrote too much or whatever. I just thought I might be able to join in on an interesting conversation and maybe help answer a few questions.
|