Wow, guys and ladies. Lots of ideas here. As for Obama, as the only New Yorker here, and having been schooled and indoctrinated in some New York ideas which aren't typical perhaps elsewhere, it's interesting to hear all of you from other parts of the country. I have to admit I voted for him, but now it turns out he has no substance or special knowledge, especially about foreign affairs. I think we thought Biden would even things out in terms of experience, but that isn't happening. We should have taken his affiliation with Rev Wright more seriously.
I agree with Wally and Eric that Obama's being very harmful in dealing with Israel, which cannot go back to earlier borders if it is to survive. It also can't keep on giving "land for peace" - that hasn't worked any time it was tried. The Palestinians will never settle, don't really want their own state, just want Israel out of there, which is also what the surrounding Arab countries want. On the other hand, when the media isn't around, they admit that if Israel were to eliminate all the settlements in the West Bank, and were to withdraw as it did in Gaza, that entire West Bank area would simply become a base for terrorism, which the Arab countries don't want. And the Arab leaders ironically also do want Israel around to complain about - to detract their populace as well as the rest of the world from the failings of their own terrible governments, which are so corrupt, abusive of women, poor, and unproductive. So this is an insolvable problem, and the Israelis will have to try to stand their ground until Obama passes from the scene.
It should also be mentioned that Israel is a democratic country, the only one in the Middle East. Twenty percent of Israelis are Arabs, who are full citizens with equal rights as Jewish Israelis, and have the highest standard of living among surrounding Arab countries. There are also black Israelis, specifically the Jews from Ethiopia who were secretly airlifted into Israel years ago. So when words like "apartheid" are tossed around by the likes of Jimmy Carter, it's a totally false accusation.
As for health care - I haven't been following the constant changes in the proposals and find all the comments and things I read confusing. Just one thing - I have been on Medicare, which is a pretty good medical care system, so I don't quite understand the fear of "government control" that I'm hearing. I have a work-related secondary insurance that is also a government plan, one that is offered by the state I worked in. I see nothing wrong with extending this kind of care to others. It seems to work well, and has given us care when we needed it while keeping exorbitant doctor/hospital costs down, while maintaining our choices of care - my husband, for example, had a kidney transplant two years ago, which saved his life, and was paid for by Medicare.
Also, when you look at medical statistics, it's not altogether true that we as a country have the healthiest people or the best medical care as compared to other countries. The Japanese, who have national care for everyone, are the longest living. Our infant mortality numbers are quite poor. And bankruptcies that are often related to bad health in this country don't happen elsewhere. But It's all very complicated and we shouldn't rush into any plan that will not be good for our country.
|