Home
Back

Dear visitor, if you know the answer to this question, please post it. Thank you!

Page 184 of 233: Posts 3661 - 3680 of 4653
prev
1 ... 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 ... 233
next

War shrines 2013/12/29 01:32
Just a few dozen miles from my home is a Civil War battlefield, protected by state and federal law. Also not too far from here are graves and statues honoring those who fell while attempting to split the United States into two countries.
In our nation's capital, American war dead are honored with any number of shrines. This is our tradition and does not glorify war.
by Eric (guest) rate this post as useful

Re: Yokohama Navy Exchange was where? 2013/12/29 11:57
Thank you very much, good answers.

The conservative swing of Japan was written to some newspapers.
However, I think that they are wrong.
The Japanese government needs to defend people, territory and property.

Recently at last, in a sporting event or Olympics game, Japanese players have respect in the national flag, and sing national anthem. About worship of the Prime Minister's Yasukuni shrine, about 80% or more of people agree.

And I think the Japan Emperor of those days was also responsible for the Pacific War. It was because the chief executive of the country was not able to stop the participation in war. The present Emperor encourage the victims of the big earthquake of northeast part.


I hope more people see Japan Guide.

Arigatou gozaimasu.


by Kaoru (guest) rate this post as useful

Re: Yokohama Navy Exchange was where? 2013/12/29 17:11
Well here I go.

I hesitate to voice my opinion against a native Japanese on the above subject but it is my understanding that the last emperor did not start the war. From the little I know that the strong Imperial army forced it upon Japan. He may have stopped it but he did not. This is different from starting a war. I stand to be corrected if I am wrong.
by Peter (guest) rate this post as useful

Re: Yokohama Navy Exchange was where? 2013/12/30 11:19
Peter "I hate to voice my opinion against a native Japanese on the above subject but it is my understanding that the last emperor did not start the war. From the little I know that the strong Imperial army forced it upon Japan. He may have stopped it but he did not. This is different from starting a war. I stand to be corrected if I am wrong"

Hello Peter. Ditto for me.
by Joe G (guest) rate this post as useful

Re: Yokohama Navy Exchange was where? 2013/12/31 06:55
Konnichiwa,

Japan is the early morning of New Year's Eve. Yokohama is fine weather.


For several years in the 1950s, The U. S. Army Signal Corps produced a weekly film and sent it free of charge to American TV stations.
The show was titled "The Big Picture," and covered activities of American servicemen and women on foreign assignments.


The Army wanted to justify the expense of posting thousands of soldiers overseas, even after World War II had ended.
Whether the scene was Europe or Asia, Berlin or Yokohama, each film maintained American soldiers were holding back Russian Communism from devouring free people.


Critics might describe these films as propaganda.
Still, the scenes from the 1950s era bring back memories of a time when America was helping to rebuild war torn nations and lift up their people who had once been enemies.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sD8ncV4gkqs
by Kaoru (guest) rate this post as useful

The Big Picture 2014/1/1 08:35
Hi Kaoru-san

Where do you find this stuff ?

I remember "The Big Picture" as a child.
Even then it seemed a little simplified.

I have no quarrel with the content as such, and I loved the old movie. Especially the making of toys from old tin cans. Do you know how much these "early" toys go for now ? Tons. Eric must see this as its old home week for him.

This film is a far cry from the "documentarys" that were put out during the War. Tons, [there is that word again]

To all of my good friends at JP Guide and especially to JP Guide staff. I would like to wish you a very Happy New Year. Thank you for hosting this ongoing Blah Blah. It is our pleasure to give you all of this user generated content that drives your search engine ranking up there. I think that you should have us over for lunch. Your PR people will love it. Maybe next year...ooopps
that's in about 6 hours from now. Im free when ever.





Thank you Kaoru-san.
by Peter (guest) rate this post as useful

Tin can toys 2014/1/3 00:03
I remember those toys Peter mentioned. My dad bought a little fire truck toy for me that appeared to be one piece of tin, held together with folded tabs. I'm sure I wasn't the only Giajin kid that became curious about what was inside.
Gently prying the toy open, I discovered the signature of "Libby's peas."
by Eric (guest) rate this post as useful

Todays Haiku 2014/1/9 11:34
At Four thirty

The evening sunlight shines....

now, on the tops of the trees...

by Peter (guest) rate this post as useful

Last Japanese holdout soldier (Pacific War) obit 2014/1/18 16:49
Hiroo Onoda, Soldier Who Hid in Jungle for Decades, Dies at 91
JAN. 17, 2014

Hiroo Onoda, an Imperial Japanese Army officer who remained at his jungle post on an island in the Philippines for 29 years, refusing to believe that World War II was over, and returned to a herofs welcome in the all but unrecognizable Japan of 1974, died Thursday at a Tokyo hospital, the Japanese government said. He was 91.

Caught in a time warp, 2nd Lt. Onoda was one of the warfs last holdouts: a soldier who believed the emperor was a deity and the war a sacred mission; who survived on bananas and coconuts and sometimes killed villagers he assumed were enemies; who finally went home to the lotus land of paper and wood that turned out to be a futuristic world of skyscrapers, television, jet planes, pollution and atomic destruction.
Japanese history and literature are replete with heroes who have remained loyal to a cause, especially if it is lost or hopeless, and Lieutenant Onoda, a small, wiry man of dignified manner and military bearing, seemed to many like a samurai of old, offering his sword as a gesture of surrender to President Ferdinand E. Marcos of the Philippines, who returned it to him.

And his homecoming, with roaring crowds, celebratory parades and speeches by public officials, stirred his nation with a pride that many Japanese had found lacking in postwar years of rising prosperity and materialism. His ordeal of deprivation may have seemed a pointless waste to much of the world, but in Japan it was a moving reminder of the redemptive qualities of duty and perseverance.

It happened with a simple command. As related in a memoir after he came home, Lieutenant Onodafs last order in early 1945 was to stay and fight. Loyal to a military code that taught that death was preferable to surrender, he remained behind on Lubang Island, 93 miles southwest of Manila, when Japanese forces withdrew in the face of an American invasion.

After Japan surrendered in August, thousands of Japanese soldiers were scattered across China, Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific. Many stragglers were captured or went home, while hundreds went into hiding rather than surrender or commit suicide. Many died of starvation or sickness. A few survivors refused to believe the dropped leaflets and radio announcements saying the war had been lost.

Lieutenant Onoda, an intelligence officer trained in guerrilla tactics, and three enlisted men with him found leaflets proclaiming the warfs end, but believed they were enemy propaganda tricks. They built bamboo huts; ate bananas, coconuts and rice pilfered from a village, and killed cows for meat. Tormented by tropical heat, rats and mosquitoes, they patched their uniforms and kept their rifles in working order.
Considering themselves at war, they evaded American and Filipino search parties and attacked islanders they took to be enemy guerrillas; about 30 inhabitants were killed in skirmishes with the Japanese over the years. One of the enlisted men surrendered to Filipino forces in 1950, and two others were shot dead, one in 1954 and another in 1972, by island police officers searching for the renegades.

The last holdout, Lieutenant Onoda \ officially declared dead in 1959 \ was found by Norio Suzuki, a student searching for him in 1974. The lieutenant rejected his pleas to go home, insisting he was still awaiting orders. Mr. Suzuki returned with photographs, and the Japanese government sent a delegation, including the lieutenantfs brother and his former commander, to formally relieve him of duty.

gI am sorry I have disturbed you for so long a time,h Lieutenant Onoda told his brother, Toshiro.

In Manila, the lieutenant, wearing his tattered uniform, presented his sword to President Marcos, who pardoned him for crimes committed while he thought he was at war.

He was already a national hero when he arrived in Tokyo. He was met by his aging parents and huge flag-waving crowds with an outpouring of emotion. More than patriotism or admiration for his grit, his jungle saga, which had dominated the news in Japan for days, evoked waves of nostalgia and melancholy in a people searching for deeper meaning in their growing postwar affluence.
The 52-year-old lieutenant \ a ghost from the past in a new blue suit, close-cropped military haircut and wispy mustache and chin whiskers \ spoke earnestly of duty, and seemed to personify a devotion to traditional values that many Japanese thought had been lost.

gI was fortunate that I could devote myself to my duty in my young and vigorous years,h he said. Asked what had been on his mind all those years in the jungle, he said: gNothing but accomplishing my duty.h

In an editorial, The Mainichi Shimbun, a leading Tokyo newspaper, said: gTo this soldier, duty took precedence over personal sentiments. Onoda has shown us that there is much more in life than just material affluence and selfish pursuits. There is the spiritual aspect, something we may have forgotten.h

After his national welcome in Japan, Mr. Onoda was examined by doctors, who found him in amazingly good condition. He was given a military pension and signed a $160,000 contract for a ghostwritten memoir, gNo Surrender: My Thirty Year War.h As his story went global in books, articles and documentaries, he tried to lead a normal life.

He went dancing, took driving lessons and traveled up and down the Japanese islands. But he found himself a stranger in a strange land, disillusioned with materialism and overwhelmed by changes. gThere are so many tall buildings and automobiles in Tokyo,h he said. gTelevision might be convenient, but it has no influence on my life here.h

In 1975, he moved to a Japanese colony in São Paulo, Brazil, raised cattle and in 1976 married Machie Onuku, a Japanese tea-ceremony teacher. In 1984, the couple returned to Japan and founded the Onoda Nature School, a survival-skills youth camp. In 1996, he revisited Lubang and gave $10,000 to a school. In recent years, he lived in Japan and Brazil, where he was made an honorary citizen in 2010.

Hiroo Onoda was born on March 19, 1922, in Kainan, Wakayama, in central Japan, one of seven children of Tanejiro and Tamae Onoda. At 17, he went to work for a trading company in Wuhan, China, which Japanese forces occupied in 1938. In 1942, he joined the Japanese Army, was singled out for special training and attended Nakano School, the armyfs training center for intelligence officers. He studied guerrilla warfare, philosophy, history, martial arts, propaganda and covert operations.

In late December 1944, he was sent to Lubang, a strategic island 16 miles long and 6 miles wide on the southwestern approach to Manila Bay and the island of Corregidor, with orders to sabotage harbor installations and an airstrip to disrupt a coming American invasion. But superior officers on the island superseded those orders to focus on preparations for a Japanese evacuation.

When American forces landed on Feb. 28, 1945, and the last Japanese fled or were killed, Maj. Yoshimi Taniguchi gave Lieutenant Onoda his final orders, to stand and fight. gIt may take three years, it may take five, but whatever happens wefll come back for you,h the major promised.

Twenty-nine years later, the retired major, by then a bookseller, returned to Lubang at Tokyofs request to fulfill his promise. Japan had lost the war, he said, and the lieutenant was relieved of duty. The ragged soldier saluted and wept.
by wata geiru rate this post as useful

Weighing in on Yasukuni Shrine discussion 2014/1/18 18:00
There is no problem with honoring the war dead of any country. The issue in Europe (as mentioned above) was a cemetery that contained Waffen SS (Nazi party members), if I remember correctly. Had these been ordinary drafted German soldiers I believe there would have been little opposition.

The issue at Yasukuni is not the millions of Japanese soldiers who died in the service of their Emperor and nation. When the World War II dead were originally enshrined at Yasukuni, convicted war criminals were specifically omitted. This involved a handful of individuals (fewer than 20). I visited Yasukuni during that time (early 1960s).

Then a political decision was made to enshrine the convicted war criminals. This process was around the mid-1960s. If someone now wishes to visit Yasukuni to honor the dead in Japan's service since the Meiji era, including the Pacific War, the criminals cannot be excluded, since they now have been treated like every brave soldier who went to war and was killed. Speaking for myself, I would not visit Yasukuni today because of this change to the fundamental meaning of the shrine.

I think the objection by other Asian countries to visits by Japanese political leaders stems from the fact that it can be seen as esteeming those very warlords who brutalized the citizens of those countries. Even if the intention of the shrine visitor is just to honor their own grandfather or uncle, it is impossible to avoid appearing to approve of the acts of the convicted criminals.

In my own opinion, it diminishes the citizen-soldiers who fought and died by lumping them in with some very cruel, very murderous, higher ranking individuals--those convicted and originally not considered for inclusion at Yasukuni shrine.

There was some adroit political maneuvering involved in the decision to reverse the decision not to honor the criminals, including questioning whether the tribunal that convicted them was empowered to make someone a criminal (although this was accepted by Japan as a condition of acceptance of the peace treaty, several years after the end of hostilities). For anyone who is unfamiliar with the crimes and criminals in question, and their actions that led to their trials and convictions, an overview is available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_war_criminals

Please understand I am not attempting to start any discussion about whether the Japanese Imperial forces were better or worse than any others; that is an issue for another day. I am only responding to the impression apparently held by several commenters above that the objections that were made to visits by current Japanese leaders to Yasukuni involved respect (or lack of it) for the very many men and boys, and some civilians, who answered their country's call and paid the ultimate price for it. That is not the case; it is specific to the decision made to treat convicted war criminals as though they were ordinary patriotic soldiers.
by wata geiru rate this post as useful

Lt. Onoda 2014/1/19 03:03
I remember back in '74 when Lt. Onoda came out of the jungle. There had been rumors for years of Japanese soldiers either left behind or remaining behind long after the war.
His story is remarkable and is a tribute to the Japanese people.
by Eric (guest) rate this post as useful

Re: Yokohama Navy Exchange was where? 2014/1/19 11:32
wata geiru, please post the source of the article you copied into the forum. Otherwise we will have to delete it for copyright reasons.
by admin rate this post as useful

Onoda obituary. 2014/1/20 00:26
My apologies. I thought I had given the source and I see that it is missing.

The obituary was printed in the Chicago Sun-Times and is also posted to the website of that daily newspaper.
by wata geiru rate this post as useful

"Stragglers" 2014/1/20 00:39
There were probably hundreds of Japanese Imperial soldiers who remained behind, scattered across various Pacific islands, the Philippines, and perhaps New Guinea and other battlefields, following the end of hostilities in the Pacific in 1945. Some were eventually located by Japan, enticed out of hiding, and repatriated; some met their end at the hands of local populations, as happened to one of Mr. Onoda's companions. Some, of course, just did not survive solitary existence in harsh climates.

I had a friend, an American WW II veteran, who was a biologist who was on a research trip on Pacific islands in the 1950s. While tracking through some back country, he suddenly came across an encampment. The occupant was not present but it appeared that the person was such a Japanese "holdout." Not knowing whether the individual was close by, my friend, hairs on his neck standing up, just kept moving and got back to his own station as quickly as he could.

Žc—¯“ú–{•º http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_holdout
by wata geiru rate this post as useful

Honoring War Dead 2014/1/20 08:22
The winners of wars determine who the war criminals were and how history will remember the war. If the results were reversed there would have been a different group of war criminals.
I honor the war dead of both sides. I went to war over fifty years ago and lost friends. As I look at all that has happened in my own life since then I realize more and more what those who were killed sacrificed.
by Dave-san (guest) rate this post as useful

Dave-san 2014/1/21 21:08
I certainly agree with you about honoring those who died in war, and your sentiments about how much they lost. (I do have some close involvement with that subject.)

I disagree with your implication that there is some moral equivalency between all sides, particularly in World War II. Note that those who were tried and convicted of war crimes did not actually die in the war (although that is not my main point). I completely understand the objections the Chinese make to seeming to exalt the perpetrators of the Rape of Nanking, for example. I maintain my position that I would not visit a memorial to Hitler and Goebbels, again as an example.
by wata geiru (guest) rate this post as useful

Wata Geiru-san 2014/1/22 16:34
I didn't mean imply a moral equivalency between all sides or anything of that nature. I wouldn't visit a memorial to Hitler or Goebbels either although I'm not sure any exist.
Old men start wars and young men and women (and civilians) die in them. The combatants on both sides believe they are doing their duty and I respect that. What politicians say about it later is whatever suits their purpose in my opinion.
by Dave-san (guest) rate this post as useful

Re: Yokohama Navy Exchange was where? 2014/1/23 01:07
I do not believe that there are any "memorials" as you mentioned.

There is however, the Bergohf Hitlors "Eagles Nest in Bavaria that many people visit every year, not out of any respect but out of curiosity, and the mountain views. Also there is the Vogelsang, a castle that housed a chamber for ceremonies.

A while ago I mentioned a movie available on you-tube called Battle of the Pacific. It portrays a small company of Japanese holdouts on Saipan. Not a great movie as such but no doubt of intrest to us here. A little improbable in some respects like the American officer that speaks perfect Japanese, but worth watching.

I wonder about the holdouts that were never found. What a story that would make.

wata-geru, you hinted at a personal association to war losses. Could you share that with us?
by Peter (guest) rate this post as useful

Okay, Peter 2014/1/23 17:34
I don't really want to discuss it, but per your request I will fill you in. My brother was a helicopter pilot doing med-evacs. A position with two wounded who were to be picked up had been booby-trapped by the Viet Cong. All aboard and more on the ground--thirteen--died.

For what it is worth, I never, then or later, hated or even was angry with the Viet Cong or the Vietnamese people.

"At 051750H [5:50 pm, 05 April] a fireteam at BS843366 from Co G/2/7 tripped a 105mm artillery shell devised as an anti-personnel mine. As a UH-1E med-evac helicopter hovered over the LZ at BS841367, a large explosion occurred under the helicopter causing it to disintegrate. While rushing to aid the wounded, Marines of G/2/7 tripped another large explosive device at BS844367. A search of the area disclosed a 300 meter length of comm wire leading from the LZ to a cane field at BS846367, indicating the helicopter was destroyed by a command detonated bomb. Analysis of both craters showed the explosives used were at least 250 lb bombs or larger. USMC casualties were 10 KIA and 13 WIA." from 3rd Bn, 7th Marines' Command Chronology
by wata geiru rate this post as useful

wata geiru 2014/1/23 23:47
I didn't mean to pry if that was difficult for you. But I appreciate the personal recollection. It was a difficult time. Your brother served bravely. Don't feel you have to but when were you in Yokohama and where did you stay and do?

I was there from 67-69 and was mostly working on the docks as a food inspector. Army SP 5 when I left.
by PETER (guest) rate this post as useful

Page 184 of 233: Posts 3661 - 3680 of 4653
prev
1 ... 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 ... 233
next

reply to this thread